Fr. Henri de Lubac, S.J. |
One such person was the Jesuit Henri de Lubac, a French theologian no one could dismiss as a reactionary. In his Vatican II diaries, de Lubac entered pithy observations about those he encountered. Ratzinger is portrayed as one whose powerful intellect is matched by his “peacefulness” and “affability.” Kung, by contrast, is denoted as possessing a “juvenile audacity” and speaking in “incendiary, superficial, and polemical” terms. Fr. de Lubac, incidentally, was a model of courtesy his entire life.
Something about Kung clearly bothered him. After Vatican II, Ratzinger and Kung took very divergent roads. Ratzinger emerged as a formidable defender of Catholic orthodoxy and was eventually elected pope. Kung became a theological celebrity and antagonist of the papacy. Now both men are in the evening of their earthly days. What, many wonder, occupies their minds at this time of life? In this regard, Jesus of Nazareth and Can the Church Still Be Saved? are quite revealing.
From Jesus of Nazareth’s first pages, it’s clear Benedict is focused on knowing the truth about Christ as He is rather than who we might prefer Him to be. Through a deep exposition of Scripture many evangelical Protestants will admire and a careful exploration of tradition the Eastern Orthodox will appreciate,Benedict shows Christ is who the ancient Church proclaims Him to be — not a political activist, but rather the Messiah who really lived, really died and who then proved his divinity by really rising from the dead.
Link (here) to read the rest of the article at Catholic Exchange.
3 comments:
Portraying Fr. Kung’s positions versus Pope Benedict XVI’s positions as an argument between “juvenile audacity” and “peacefulness” is not useful. We should be paying attention to God, not persuasive prose.
This reminds me of all the Republicans vs. Democrats arguments. It distracts us from the important truths, while we instead focus on sophisms.
Intellectualism, piousness, helping the poor, protecting life, humility – None of those are equivalent to God’s values and God’s judgment. We know God’s values and God’s judgment. To most readers that statement will make no sense, but that is because the still small voice is quieted with their own thoughts, beliefs, and interpretations.
Fr. Kung said: “There will be no peace among the nations without peace among the religions.” While this is not literally true, it is something we should consider literally true. Good advice, oversimplified as truth, can be easier to accept and understand by those who are unable to hear the voice of God.
Catholics misunderstand God. Or do some think they know God’s will on topics such as abortion, the death penalty, political allegiance, papal infallibility, relativism, faith, or evil? If you find such issues to be simple, then you are creating your own literal truths from oversimplified advice. You have created your own God – and it is your own judgment.
"God's will" is mysterious indeed. I agree that demonizing the other and throwing rocks at mutual encampments is dangerously simplistic.
On the other hand, Christianity is about dogma, and if one gets too off the mark you lose what is essential and why it is unique among religions.
The value of the Catholic faith is in its unwavering dedication to some fundamental truths regarding Christ. If you get too far off Orthodoxy you enter into some other thing...not Christianity -
Post a Comment