Cardinal Jean Daniélou, S.J. |
The August 7-11 meeting in St. Louis, Missouri of the Leadership
Conference of Women Religious remindsus of the sober words of Cardinal Jean
Daniélou, SJ in 1972. The LCWR featured a keynote speaker whose theme was “Conscious
Evolution,” which is as removed from the Pope and the Magisterium as science
fiction is from Albert Einstein. In the National Catholic
Reporter on August 6, 2012 Alice Popovici wrote of the LCWR keynote speaker: “Barbara
Marx Hubbard, an evolutionary thinker who is to speak this week before the
Leadership Conference of Women Religious, is not Catholic or part of any
mainstream religion. But she says she has faith in the future.”
By sharp contrast, Daniélou warned in an interview on Vatican
Radio on October 23, 1972:
One of the greatest threats to religious life
today is the mass of disputable theological opinions. In minimizing the
supernatural aspect of God’s gift, in minimizing everything that pertains to
the action of the Spirit, it destroys the very base on which the religious life
is built. That is why it is important today to seek out spiritual directors and
theologians from those who represent the true thinking of the Church. There
must be a care to have a deep unity with the sovereign Pontiff and with the
orientations given by him the Sovereign Pontiff, in particular those which
concern religious life.
As to a union with the Sovereign Pontiff, the LCWR rejected
even the presence of the canonical pontifical delegate:
Archbishop J. Peter Sartain of Seattle, who
has been charged by the Vatican with responsibility for supervising a reform of
the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), has been told by the group’s
leaders that his presence ‘would not be helpful’ at the LCWR’s annual assembly
this week.
On the subject of the crisis in religious life, again in 1972
Daniélou spoke thus:
Vatican II declared that human values must be
taken seriously. It never said that we were entering in to a secularized world
where the religious dimension would be no longer present in civilization. It is
in the name of a false secularization that religious men and women give up
their religious habit and abandon the adoration of God for social and political
activities. And this is, furthermore, counter to the spiritual need manifested
in the world of today. (Why the Church?,
p. 166-167)
Robert A. Connor succinctly
summarizes the cardinal’s lifetime work:
After his short spell as a military
chaplain ended with the fall of France in 1940, he devoted himself to the study
of the Fathers of the Church, and with Fr. Henri de Lubac was one of the
founders of Sources Chrétiennes, a popular yet scholarly series of key writings
from the patristic period. Over the years, Daniélou produced a flow of books
and articles on the worship and theology of the Early Church. Such was his
reputation and influence that Blessed Pope John XXIII named him as a
theological expert for the Second Vatican Council. In 1969 he was made a
cardinal by Pope Paul VI, and elected to the Académie Française.
Why would a patristics scholar of Daniélou’s stature get involved
in current Church events at such a popular level?
Link (here) to the full piece by Fr. Brian Van Hove, S.J., entitled, The Lasting Legacy of Cardinal Daniélou
No comments:
Post a Comment