Friday, November 16, 2007

Barista? I'll Have An Arrupe, With A Sprinkle Of O'Keefe And Touch Of Dezza

Time Magazine Monday, Nov. 09, 1981
John Paul Takes On the Jesuits
.
The Pope picks his own team to head the powerful order The Jesuits swear an oath of obedience to the papacy but, throughout their 441-year history, their independent ways and elitist style have ruffled many Popes. John Paul II, no stranger to controversy, last week took a bold step to bridle the Society of Jesus. In a move interpreted as a warning to all religious orders, he suspended the normal workings of the Jesuit Constitutions, removed the acting leader of the organization and replaced him with two Italian Jesuits who enjoy the Vatican's confidence: Paolo Dezza, 79, and Joseph Pittau, 53. John Paul has entered a high-stakes game. The Jesuits are the largest (27,000) and the most dominant of the men's orders, with far-flung influence in education, theology and missions. The Superior General of the society is considered the second most powerful figure in Roman Catholicism. Pontiffs have intervened in the past by dictating the elections of Superiors General. In 1773 Pope Clement XIV even dissolved the society, a 41-year-long humiliation that some Jesuit intellectuals close to the Vatican are comparing with John Paul's treatment. The current conflict has been building ever since the Second Vatican Council, when some Jesuits began busying themselves in social action and in questioning papal teachings. In 1973 a harried

Pope Paul VI wrote Superior General Pedro Arrupe to "express our desire,
indeed our demand,"
that the Jesuits remain loyal to the papacy.

In 1979 Pope John Paul II directed Arrupe to wipe out secularism and other "regrettable shortcomings." Last year Arrupe, Superior General since 1965, cited age and health in asking John Paul's permission to resign. In August, felled by a stroke that left him partially paralyzed, Arrupe, 73, followed Jesuit legal procedure and selected a Vicar General (interim leader), American Father Vincent O'Keefe, 61, to run the order. O'Keefe is a former president of Fordham University. Unable to speak intelligibly because of his illness,
Arrupe has not replied to John Paul's announcement that he was naming Dezza as "a delegate who will represent me more closely in the society"
until a General Congregation elects Arrupe's permanent successor. When Arrupe was chosen Superior General, Dezza and O'Keefe were among his four advisers. Dezza, no reactionary but well to the right of both Arrupe and O'Keefe, is a philosopher and onetime rector of Rome's Pontifical Gregorian University. John Paul named the energetic Pittau to assist the aged, partially blind Dezza and take over "should he be impeded or die." Pittau, considered a moderate, is the sort of well-trained, efficient academic who catches John Paul's eye. A Harvard Ph.D. in sociology, he is rector of Tokyo's Sophia University and, since last year, leader of the Japan province. O'Keefe remains an adviser to the new team and refuses to comment.

In a letter to Arrupe, John Paul saw a need for "more thorough preparation
of the society"
before a General Congregation is held.

That is being read as a signal that John Paul wants the Jesuits to shape up before the election of a new leader. As a result, no one in Rome sees a replacement for the Dezza-Pittau administration until at least 1983 and perhaps years beyond that.
Link to the original Time Magazine piece (here)

2 comments:

Viator Catholicus said...

Interestingly, John Paul I had a letter to the Jesuits which was dated and to be issued on September 29th.
As a young boy, the future pope had been heavily influenced by his parish priest, Fr. Felice Cappello, SJ, and had considered joining the Jesuits. As a priest, he earned his Doctorate from the Gregorianum.
However, he was quite disheartened with the goings on in the Society after the second Vatican Council. The letter which he never issued, since he died the night of the 28th, was a bit of a rebuke against the Society and especially called on them to stop causing confusion among the faithful by the heterorthodoxy in their publications.
I believe John Paul II incorporated some of John Paul I's letter in his own letter. subsequently.

Joseph Fromm said...

Thank you for the thoughtful insights.
Joseph