A young Varisco |
“I don’t have any desire to debate Robert Spencer….I would never give someone like that a forum,” Hofstra University Professor Daniel Martin Varisco declared at Georgetown University on February 26, 2014. Addressing the Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Christian-Muslim Understanding (ACMCU), Varisco’s equally flawed outlooks on Islam and intellectual inquiry had disturbing implications for modern academia. Prior perusal of the opening pages of Varisco’s 2007 Reading Orientalism: Said and Unsaid did not raise hopes for his briefing “Khutba vs. Khutzpa: Islamophobia on the Internet.” In this book, Varisco analyzes leftwing intellectual Edward Said’s Orientalism
and its legacy, expressing agreement “with most of Said’s political
positions on the real Orient.” Varisco reveals his discipleship of Said
with condemnations of post-World War II United States having “become by
stealth and wealth the neo-colonial superpower” in which a “neocon
clique…engineered the wars” not just “against” Iraq but also
Afghanistan. Varisco’s one-sided estimate of historical harms includes a
“PhD cataloguing of what the West did to the East and
self-unfillfulling political punditry about what real individuals in the
East say they want to do to the West.
Link (here) to Front Page Mag
1 comment:
I'm very familiar with Robert Spencer, but have never heard of Varisco at all...and am not going to go out of my way to find or read any of his works. Anyone who brandishes the term "Islamophobia" as an answer to all valid arguments against Mohammedanism is IMHO not worth dealing with.
Post a Comment