Fr. Jose O'Callaghan was born in Tortosa (south of Catalunya, Spain), on the 7th of October 1922. He entered the Society of Jesus in 1940 and was ordained to the priesthood in 1952. He obtained a licentiate in Theology in 1953 and a doctorate in Philosophy and Letters at the University of Madrid in 1959. His interest in Christian culture and classical world led him to continue his studies in Milan, where he worked under the supervision of Prof. Montevecchi. In 1960 Fr. O'Callaghan obtained a doctorate in Classics at the University of Milan with his thesis Cartas cristianas griegas del siglo V. From 1961 to 1971 Fr. O'Callaghan taught at the Faculty of Theology of San Cugat of Valles (Barcelona). During those years he founded the "Seminari de Papirologia", which he continued to direct throughout his life. Thanks to the generosity of his brother-in-law, Josep Palau Ribes, Fr. O'Callaghan was able to purchase a large number of papyri and to found the journal Studia Papyrologica (1962-1983) and two series of publications, Papyrologica Castroctaviana (1967-1988) and Estudis de Papirologia i Filologia Biblica (1991-1995). In 1971 he was called to teach papyrology at the Pontifical Biblical Institute, where he remained until his retirement in 1992. He was dean of the Biblical Faculty from 1983 to 1986. During these years he was also visiting professor at the University of Urbino.
Original article (here)
Why Fr. Jose O' Callaghan is so important!
The Catholic traditionalists hold that an earlier Gospel date is important because it directly refutes "liberal Protestants and modernist Catholics" who hold that the historical Jesus hardly resembles the "later" Jesus of faith. The Lefebvrists are in agreement with this view; in the April 15, 1995 edition of their bulletin , which focused on O'Callaghan's dating of the 7Q5 fragment, they censure modern biblical scholars as "enemies of Gospel historicity." For traditionalists, O'Callaghan's theses are determinative in overturning the "rationalist" biblical criticism () of scholars such as Rudolf Bultmann (Bultmann, while accepting the historical figure of Jesus, relegated to mythology most of what he termed the New Testament "framework," including the Virgin Birth, the Resurrection, the Ascension, the Assumption, and all miracles). Bultmann maintained that a process of "de-mythification" was necessary in Christianity, a purification of the Christian message to return it to its original form, the form he believed it had when first preached by Jesus and his immediate disciples (see box on Bultmann.)
Read the rest of this great article (here)
In 1972, Fr. O'Callaghan provoked a heated discussion among New Testament scholars when he proposed that one of the Greek texts from Cave 7 of Qumran should be identified as a fragment of the Gospel of Mark. Based on this identification, he also suggested that other fragments from Cave 7 may correspond to New Testaments books. In the ensuing, occasionally bitter debate, he always knew how to maintain a reasonable and balanced distance.From his encounter as student with another Jesuit, Fr. José María Bover, who was engaged in the preparation of a critical edition of the New Testament, Fr. O'Callaghan was also introduced to textual criticism, to which he dedicated many efforts. He published, among other works, Nuevo Testamento Trilingüe (1977) and Introducción a la crítica textual del Nuevo Testamento (1999). Fr. José O'Callaghan died on the 15th of December, 2001 in the Jesuit infirmary at San Cugat del Valles (Barcelona), following a long illness. The memory that he leaves behind is one of a dedicated priest and scholar, a welcoming and cheerful man, who, in addition to his academic work, always knew how to find time for pastoral activities and be close to his colleagues and friends.
Original article (here)
Why Fr. Jose O' Callaghan is so important!
The Catholic traditionalists hold that an earlier Gospel date is important because it directly refutes "liberal Protestants and modernist Catholics" who hold that the historical Jesus hardly resembles the "later" Jesus of faith. The Lefebvrists are in agreement with this view; in the April 15, 1995 edition of their bulletin , which focused on O'Callaghan's dating of the 7Q5 fragment, they censure modern biblical scholars as "enemies of Gospel historicity." For traditionalists, O'Callaghan's theses are determinative in overturning the "rationalist" biblical criticism () of scholars such as Rudolf Bultmann (Bultmann, while accepting the historical figure of Jesus, relegated to mythology most of what he termed the New Testament "framework," including the Virgin Birth, the Resurrection, the Ascension, the Assumption, and all miracles). Bultmann maintained that a process of "de-mythification" was necessary in Christianity, a purification of the Christian message to return it to its original form, the form he believed it had when first preached by Jesus and his immediate disciples (see box on Bultmann.)
Read the rest of this great article (here)
No comments:
Post a Comment